Seats
Labor notionally holds 56 seats, the Liberal and National Coalition 29, and the Greens three. That means the Coalition needs 16 net gains to govern on its own. ABC
The post-change poll average puts the Coalition on 54.0–46.0 two-party preferred: Labor and the Coalition head to head, with every other party’s votes distributed as preferences. A 9.0-point uniform swing — the same statewide change to every seat — would carry it there, and a majority needs only 7.6 points, or 52.6–47.4 two-party. Ace StrategiesABC
- Labor-held
- 56
- Coalition-held
- 29
- Crossbench
- 3
- Coalition needs
- +16
The pendulum all 88 districts, most marginal first within each bloc
These are the 2022 results, on boundaries in force since 1 November 2022. No redistribution has happened since, so the margins are current. Margin means two-candidate preferred: the winner and the runner-up, after preferences. ABCTally RoomWikipedia
| Seat | Held by | 2022 primary | 2CP margin | 2026 note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labor-held 56 the bloc defending government | ||||
| Bass | Labor | 32.6 | 0.2 | Retiring; O-N target |
| Northcote | Labor | 40.6 | 0.2 v GRN | Greens target |
| Pakenham | Labor | 33.9 | 0.4 | Retiring; O-N leader running |
| Hastings | Labor | 37.3 | 1.4 | — |
| Pascoe Vale | Labor | — | 2.0 v GRN | — |
| Preston | Labor | 37.6 | 2.1 v GRN | Greens 2nd in 2022 |
| Ripon | Labor | 38.5 | 3.0 | O-N + NAT + LIB all running |
| Glen Waverley | Labor | 40.6 | 3.3 | — |
| Bayswater | Labor | 41.3 | 4.2 | Retiring |
| Footscray | Labor | — | 4.2 v GRN | — |
| Yan Yean | Labor | 41.4 | 4.3 | — |
| Melton | Labor | 37.7 | 4.6 | Retiring; O-N 2nd target |
| Ashwood | Labor | — | 6.2 | — |
| Sunbury | Labor | 43.1 | 6.4 | — |
| Niddrie | Labor | 43.9 | 6.7 | Premier's seat |
| Greenvale | Labor | — | 7.1 | — |
| Box Hill | Labor | — | 7.2 | — |
| Eureka | Labor | 41.0 | 7.2 | O-N target |
| Ringwood | Independent | — | 7.5 | Fowles retiring |
| Monbulk | Labor | — | 7.6 | O-N running |
| Bentleigh | Labor | — | 8.0 | — |
| Mordialloc | Labor | — | 8.2 | — |
| Narre Warren South | Labor | 48.0 | 8.3 | Retiring |
| Point Cook | Labor | — | 8.3 | — |
| Bellarine | Labor | — | 8.5 | — |
| Frankston | Labor | 41.6 | 8.7 | — |
| Narre Warren North | Labor | — | 8.7 | — |
| Sydenham | Labor | 43.5 | 8.8 | Retiring; O-N target |
| Cranbourne | Labor | — | 9.0 | O-N 56.1% in model |
| Eltham | Labor | — | 9.0 | — |
| Macedon | Labor | — | 9.5 | Retiring |
| St Albans | Labor | — | 9.6 | — |
| Carrum | Labor | — | 9.8 | — |
| South Barwon | Independent | — | 9.8 | MP sits as Ind. Labor |
| Clarinda | Labor | — | 10.2 | — |
| Mulgrave | Labor | 51.0 | 10.2 v LIB / 10.8 v IND | 2022=Andrews |
| Bendigo East | Labor | 48.3 | 10.8 | Retiring; NAT chasing |
| Werribee | Labor | — | 10.9 | By-election 0.8% |
| Albert Park | Labor | 36.4 | 11.2 | Greens 20.9% in 2022 |
| Mill Park | Labor | — | 11.6 | Retiring; O-N target |
| Wendouree | Labor | — | 11.9 | — |
| Tarneit | Labor | 46.6 | 12.3 | — |
| Essendon | Labor | — | 12.5 | Retiring |
| Bundoora | Labor | — | 12.7 | — |
| Ivanhoe | Labor | — | 12.8 | — |
| Williamstown | Labor | — | 13.4 | — |
| Oakleigh | Labor | — | 13.5 | — |
| Kororoit | Labor | — | 14.5 | — |
| Bendigo West | Labor | 46.5 | 14.6 | Retiring; NAT + O-N |
| Geelong | Labor | — | 14.7 | — |
| Broadmeadows | Labor | — | 15.5 | — |
| Thomastown | Labor | — | 15.8 | — |
| Lara | Labor | 49.7 | 15.9 | O-N running |
| Kalkallo | Labor | — | 16.5 | — |
| Dandenong | Labor | — | 18.3 | — |
| Laverton | Labor | — | 18.4 | — |
| Coalition-held 29 Liberal and National seats | ||||
| Mornington | Liberal | — | 0.7 v IND | — |
| Benambra | Liberal | 42.9 | 0.9 v IND / 13.3 v ALP | Retiring; O-N running |
| Mildura | Nationals | 25.9 | 1.2 v IND | Cupper (IND) + O-N running |
| Prahran | Liberal | — | 1.3 v GRN | Won at 2025 by-election |
| Croydon | Liberal | — | 1.4 | Retiring |
| Hawthorn | Liberal | 42.3 | 1.7 | Climate-200 ind. (Ibuki) running |
| Polwarth | Liberal | — | 1.8 | — |
| Caulfield | Liberal | — | 2.1 | — |
| Rowville | Liberal | — | 3.7 | Retiring; O-N running |
| Kew | Liberal | — | 4.0 | Opposition Leader's seat |
| Warrandyte | Liberal | — | 4.3 | — |
| Morwell | Nationals | 22.9 | 4.4 | O-N strongest 2022 (6.1%) |
| Berwick | Liberal | — | 4.7 | O-N running |
| Sandringham | Liberal | — | 5.0 | — |
| Brighton | Liberal | — | 5.1 | — |
| Evelyn | Liberal | 46.7 | 5.4 | O-N target |
| Bulleen | Liberal | — | 5.9 | — |
| Nepean | Liberal | — | 6.4 | O-N 24.5% at May 2026 by-election |
| Eildon | Liberal | — | 7.0 | — |
| South-West Coast | Liberal | — | 8.0 | — |
| Malvern | Liberal | — | 8.1 | Retiring |
| Euroa | Nationals | — | 9.9 | — |
| Narracan | Liberal | — | 12.9 v IND | 2023 supplementary |
| Gippsland South | Nationals | 53.3 | 15.6 | Nationals leader; O-N running |
| Ovens Valley | Nationals | — | 17.8 | — |
| Lowan | Nationals | — | 21.6 | — |
| Murray Plains | Nationals | — | 23.4 | Retiring; O-N running |
| Shepparton | Nationals | — | 24.3 v ALP (6.8 v IND in 2022) | Retiring |
| Gippsland East | Nationals | — | 24.6 | Retiring; O-N running |
| Crossbench 3 the three Greens seats | ||||
| Richmond | Greens | — | 7.3 v ALP | Labor chasing |
| Melbourne | Greens | — | 10.2 v ALP | Greens leader's seat |
| Brunswick | Greens | — | 13.5–13.7 v ALP | Seat vacant (Read died Sept 2026) |
The risk ranking 35 seats the research names as most likely to change hands
This ranks seats by a consensus of the risk evidence rather than by margin alone. A seat with a retiring member, or one where a third party is polling into second place, ranks higher than its margin suggests. SieO win % is the incumbent’s chance of winning in The Swing Is On’s simulation, at its 5 September 2026 aggregate: a low number means the model expects the seat to change hands. It only publishes one for some seats. The Swing Is OnABCRoy MorganTally Room
At that date the model’s aggregate was Coalition 28.8, Labor 25.5, One Nation 22.5, Greens 12.9 and other 10.9, over 5,000 simulations per seat. The Swing Is On
- 01
Bass Labor 0.2
Coalition (O-N outside)
ABC: "most marginal Labor-vs-Liberal contest… grave danger of losing"
- 02
- 03
Bayswater Labor 4.2
Coalition
Retiring MP; "almost impossible to see how Liberals form govt without it"
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
Narre Warren South Labor 8.3
Coalition
Retiring (Maas); ABC says "should be a straightforward pickup"
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
The seat models six published reads on how many seats each bloc wins
| Model | Labor | Coalition | Greens | One Nation | Ind. | Majority? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 election (base) | 56 | 28 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ALP +12 |
| Roy Morgan MRP (Mar–Sep 2026, n=7,708) | 40 | 31 (L-NP) | 6 | 11 | 0 | Hung — ALP/Greens 46 v L-NP/ONP 42, "too close to call" |
| YouGov MRP (Jul 2026, n=4,003, Common Threads) | 29 | 39 | 3 | 17 | 0 | Hung — Coalition 6 short |
| RedBridge/Accent MRP (Jun 2026, Trades Hall) | 35 | 39 | — | 12 | — | Hung — Coalition short |
| The Swing Is On (5 Sep 2026 simulations) | — | — | — | avg 10.9 | — | Labor majority "at certain risk"; O-N 1–27 seats in 90% of runs |
| Poll-average uniform swing | 35 | 50 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Coalition majority ~50 (blind spot: assumes no O-N wins) |
Uniform swing on the poll average puts the Coalition clear on about 50 seats. The two published seat models disagree: YouGov’s MRP for Common Threads and RedBridge/Accent’s MRP for Victorian Trades Hall — each estimating every seat from one poll — both left the Coalition on 39 of 88, six short of the 45 it needs. They modelled One Nation at 12 to 17 seats, enough to decide who governs without winning government. Ace StrategiesYouGov
The uniform-swing row assumes One Nation wins nothing. The other models don’t. Ace Strategies
The limitsread before you act on a number
A seat model is a snapshot. The MRPs were in the field in June and July, before Ben Carroll replaced Jacinta Allan as premier. They describe the contest when they were run, not where it lands on 28 November. Ace Strategies
The uncertainty is bigger than the quoted sampling error. Ace Strategies puts a ±1.0 band on its poll average from sampling, and ±1.4 across polling houses. House effects are larger, and they’re shown separately. Two pollsters can agree on the average and still disagree about the election. Ace Strategies
Nobody has measured preferences at seat level. The models assume One Nation preferences flow to the Coalition — Ace’s default is 75–25, following the 2025 federal flows in Victoria. Move that to 60–40 and the Coalition’s two-party vote falls from 53.0 to 49.6, from a majority to none, without a single primary vote changing. Ace Strategies
Where third parties are involved, the model is the weakest link. Seats with a retiring member get an average −4.30-point primary swing, and One Nation is modelled at a scale it has never been counted at in Victoria. Read the probabilities as a ranking of uncertainty, not a prediction. The Swing Is OnAce Strategies