The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments (Kalla & Broockman, 2018)
Kalla & Broockman, "The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments", American Political Science Review
Full citation. Kalla, Joshua L. & David E.
record src_meth_kalla_broockman_2018
Quoted from this source 6 passages
“Together these studies suggest that the most optimistic estimate that could be warranted from the literature is that campaign contact persuades about 1 in 175 voters, but that our best guess is that it persuades about 1 in 800 voters, substantively zero.”
“These results are not an artifact of survey measurement: in precinct randomized experiments that do not rely on self-reported survey data, we find an average treatment effect of −0.02 percentage points.”
“Our outreach to authors of previous experiments and listservs yielded at least five additional experiments with null effects that have not been written up”
“We argue that the best estimate of the effects of campaign contact and advertising on Americans' candidates choices in general elections is zero.”
“the average effect … of 3.16 percentage points with a 95% confidence interval from 1.34 to 4.99 percentage points”
“We see clear significant effects in both these election types.”
Relied on by 2 pages
Every source Terrain holds is listed in the index. Records are held independently of this site, so a link to one keeps working if the page is rebuilt.